<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.buglist.net/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Buglist.net</title>
	
	<link>http://buglist.net</link>
	<description>Unofficial Adobe Omniture buglist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:41:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.buglist.net/Buglistnet" /><feedburner:info uri="buglistnet" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/</creativeCommons:license><feedburner:emailServiceId>Buglistnet</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Discover encoding difficulties</title>
		<link>http://feeds.buglist.net/~r/Buglistnet/~3/SgxGsoGPtsg/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2010/01/discover-encoding-difficulties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[character set]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encoding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=1175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been spending some time with Omniture Discover lately. What a truly amazing product Discover is, I&#8217;m almost speechless.
Unfortunately it does have a few rough edges here and there, character encoding difficulties being an example.
This is what the Danish characters æ ø and å looks like inside Discover: (perfect)

This is the same data after being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been spending some time with Omniture Discover lately. What a truly amazing product Discover is, I&#8217;m almost speechless.<br />
Unfortunately it does have a few rough edges here and there, character encoding difficulties being an example.</p>
<p>This is what the Danish characters <strong>æ</strong> <strong>ø</strong> and <strong>å</strong> looks like inside Discover: (perfect)</p>
<p><a href="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/character_encoding_in_omniture_discover.png" rel="lightbox[1175]"><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/character_encoding_in_omniture_discover-300x141.png" alt="Character encoding in Omniture Discover" title="Character encoding in Omniture Discover" width="300" height="141" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1176" /></a></p>
<p>This is the same data after being exported in Excel format by Omniture Discover: (not pretty)</p>
<p><a href="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/character_encoding_in_omniture_discover_excel_output.png" rel="lightbox[1175]"><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/character_encoding_in_omniture_discover_excel_output-300x207.png" alt="Character encoding in Omniture Discover Excel output" title="Character encoding in Omniture Discover Excel output" width="300" height="207" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1177" /></a></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dsoC-hisFvOdnvqBc4RcXCxGxEQ/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dsoC-hisFvOdnvqBc4RcXCxGxEQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dsoC-hisFvOdnvqBc4RcXCxGxEQ/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dsoC-hisFvOdnvqBc4RcXCxGxEQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Buglistnet/~4/SgxGsoGPtsg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2010/01/discover-encoding-difficulties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://buglist.net/2010/01/discover-encoding-difficulties/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>More about Omniture timezone handling</title>
		<link>http://feeds.buglist.net/~r/Buglistnet/~3/g60MWPkuiKQ/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/12/more-about-omniture-timezone-handling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Warehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SiteCatalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time zone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=1101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been writing about Omnitures way of dealing with timzones previously, since then a few changes has been made to both the SiteCatalyst and the Data Warehouse report scheduler.
SiteCatalyst
When setting the scheduling options in a report scheduled for later delivery in SiteCatalyst You&#8217;ll see a dialog box pretty much like this, notice the lack off timezone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been writing about Omnitures way of <a href="http://buglist.net/2009/04/time-zone-disorder/">dealing with timzones</a> previously, since then a few changes has been made to both the SiteCatalyst and the Data Warehouse report scheduler.</p>
<p><strong>SiteCatalyst</strong></p>
<p>When setting the scheduling options in a report scheduled for later delivery in SiteCatalyst You&#8217;ll see a dialog box pretty much like this, notice the lack off timezone indication next to the &#8220;Time of day&#8221; dropdown.</p>
<p><a href="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sitecatalyst_scheduled_report_setup.png" rel="lightbox[1101]"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1140" title="Setting up a new scheduled report in Omniture SiteCatalyst" src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sitecatalyst_scheduled_report_setup-300x244.png" alt="Setting up a new scheduled report in Omniture SiteCatalyst" width="300" height="244" /></a></p>
<p>So what timezone is this? Is it Utah time? No, it&#8217;s in fact your local timezone, this will become obvious if you try editing an existing report, in this case you&#8217;ll see the timezone indicator next to the &#8220;Time of day&#8221; dropdown.</p>
<p><a href="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sitecatalyst_scheduled_report_editing.png" rel="lightbox[1101]"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1150" title="Editing an existing scheduled report in Omniture SiteCatalyst" src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sitecatalyst_scheduled_report_editing-300x242.png" alt="Editing an existing scheduled report in Omniture SiteCatalyst" width="300" height="242" /></a></p>
<p>I know, no big deal, just confusing, especially for the new SiteCatalyst user.</p>
<p><strong>Data Warehouse</strong><br />
Schedule editing in Data Warehouse is not that different from SiteCatalyst, but there is one big difference you need to be aware about. Even though the dialog box shows you that things will execute at a certain time in your local timezone, this isn&#8217;t what really happens, everything in Data Warehouse happens at Pacific Standard Time (I think it is).<br />
Being located in Denmark as I am, this means that the earliest possible time at which I can get a Data Warehouse request to execute is 9 AM local Danish time if I need yesterdays data included in the report.</p>
<p><a href="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/data_warehouse_schedule_editing.png" rel="lightbox[1101]"><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/data_warehouse_schedule_editing-300x203.png" alt="Omniture Data Warehouse report schedule editing" title="Omniture Data Warehouse report schedule editing" width="300" height="203" class="size-medium wp-image-1158" /></a></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/WN7V0AHaCMDaq_O8P9FQq3LT5L8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/WN7V0AHaCMDaq_O8P9FQq3LT5L8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/WN7V0AHaCMDaq_O8P9FQq3LT5L8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/WN7V0AHaCMDaq_O8P9FQq3LT5L8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Buglistnet/~4/g60MWPkuiKQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/12/more-about-omniture-timezone-handling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://buglist.net/2009/12/more-about-omniture-timezone-handling/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Yet another conversion classification editor issue</title>
		<link>http://feeds.buglist.net/~r/Buglistnet/~3/MiAnyXEZ5Ro/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/11/yet-another-conversion-classification-editor-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SiteCatalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=1072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago while trying to rearrange our Campaign classifications, I found yet another SiteCatalyst conversion classification editor issue.
You can&#8217;t date enable a classification, and by the way disabling an already date enabled classification won&#8217;t work either.
I do think the Conversion classification editor has been having quite a few issues lately.
Workaround:
As usual, switching back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/date-enabling-a-conversion-classification.png" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/date-enabling-a-conversion-classification-150x150.png" alt="Date enabling a conversion classification in SiteCatalyst" title="Date enabling a conversion classification in SiteCatalyst" width="150" height="150" class="size-thumbnail left wp-image-1073" /></a>A few days ago while trying to rearrange our Campaign classifications, I found yet another SiteCatalyst conversion classification editor issue.<br />
You can&#8217;t date enable a classification, and by the way disabling an already date enabled classification won&#8217;t work either.<br />
I do think the Conversion classification editor has been having quite a few issues lately.<br />
<strong>Workaround:</strong><br />
As usual, switching back to the SiteCatalyst 13.5 GUI while performing administrative tasks is a possible workaround.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7Bknx9goj4RoUpTTWE6gFy_0VHU/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7Bknx9goj4RoUpTTWE6gFy_0VHU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7Bknx9goj4RoUpTTWE6gFy_0VHU/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7Bknx9goj4RoUpTTWE6gFy_0VHU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Buglistnet/~4/MiAnyXEZ5Ro" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/11/yet-another-conversion-classification-editor-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://buglist.net/2009/11/yet-another-conversion-classification-editor-issue/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>customers.omniture.com</title>
		<link>http://feeds.buglist.net/~r/Buglistnet/~3/FmTi_3i9f54/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/11/customers-omniture-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=1050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Some time ago, on October 22, Omniture announced the availability of http://customers.omniture.com/.
Early today on November 4. the site wasn&#8217;t very much available, as it went down together with Omniture Sitecatalyst. It&#8217;s hard to say precisely what went wrong, but my guess is that the loginsystem on customers.omniture.com shares some resources with the normal Omniture [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/burning-computer2-150x150.jpg" alt="burning computer" title="burning computer" width="150" height="150" class="size-thumbnail alignleft wp-image-1052" /> Some time ago, on October 22, Omniture announced the availability of <a href="http://customers.omniture.com/">http://customers.omniture.com/</a>.<br />
Early today on November 4. the site wasn&#8217;t very much available, as it went down together with Omniture Sitecatalyst. It&#8217;s hard to say precisely what went wrong, but my guess is that the loginsystem on customers.omniture.com shares some resources with the normal Omniture production environment. </p>
<p>One of the supposedly great features of customers.omniture.com is a System status grid where you can get updates on the current system status of the Omniture production environment, needless to say that for such a System status grid to be <strong>really</strong> smart, it has to be running even when everything else isn&#8217;t.<br />
Perhaps Omniture should make customers.omniture.com a bit more of a standalone system, without any ties to the rest of the Omniture network. I myself would probably even move the system to a location outside the Omniture network, this way customers.omniture.com could be available even in a situation where Omniture suffers from a complete network blackout.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b9PerdP3scuXWr2AagZ4BLkbCVc/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b9PerdP3scuXWr2AagZ4BLkbCVc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b9PerdP3scuXWr2AagZ4BLkbCVc/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b9PerdP3scuXWr2AagZ4BLkbCVc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Buglistnet/~4/FmTi_3i9f54" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/11/customers-omniture-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://buglist.net/2009/11/customers-omniture-com/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The 1969 SiteCatalyst report date issue</title>
		<link>http://feeds.buglist.net/~r/Buglistnet/~3/Cz_zilc4r7A/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/10/the-1969-sitecatalyst-report-date-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SiteCatalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peculiarities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=1012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A maintenance release a couple of months ago had a strange side effect on our report suites.
The first Custom report viewed after logging in gets the report date set to 1. Jan 1969 &#8211; 31. Dec 1969.

This is how it looks in ranked view :


And this is how it looks in trended view (this view [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A maintenance release a couple of months ago had a strange side effect on our report suites.<br />
The first Custom report viewed after logging in gets the report date set to 1. Jan 1969 &#8211; 31. Dec 1969.<br />
<br />
This is how it looks in ranked view :<br />
<a href="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/The-1969-SiteCatalyst-date-issue-ranked-view.png" rel="lightbox[1012]"><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/The-1969-SiteCatalyst-date-issue-ranked-view-300x51.png" alt="The 1969 SiteCatalyst date issue - ranked view" title="The 1969 SiteCatalyst date issue - ranked view" width="300" height="51" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1021" /></a><br />
<br />
And this is how it looks in trended view (this view effectively invalidates your report since no values are being displayed):<br />
<a href="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/The-1969-SiteCatalyst-date-issue-trended-view.png" rel="lightbox[1012]"><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/The-1969-SiteCatalyst-date-issue-trended-view-300x183.png" alt="The 1969 SiteCatalyst date issue - trended view" title="The 1969 SiteCatalyst date issue - trended view" width="300" height="183" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1022" /></a><br />
<br />
Downloading a PDF version of the report creates an funny variant where the date is being set to 1. Jan 1997:<br />
<a href="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/The-1969-SiteCatalyst-date-issue-PDF-version.png" rel="lightbox[1012]"><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/The-1969-SiteCatalyst-date-issue-PDF-version-300x154.png" alt="The 1969 SiteCatalyst date issue - PDF version" title="The 1969 SiteCatalyst date issue - PDF version" width="300" height="154" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1037" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Workaround:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Setup your report suite to display a Dashboard as the SiteCatalyst startpage.</li>
</ul>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/S2bum0l6U3qJCLK-2q7RSJ7grE0/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/S2bum0l6U3qJCLK-2q7RSJ7grE0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/S2bum0l6U3qJCLK-2q7RSJ7grE0/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/S2bum0l6U3qJCLK-2q7RSJ7grE0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Buglistnet/~4/Cz_zilc4r7A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/10/the-1969-sitecatalyst-report-date-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://buglist.net/2009/10/the-1969-sitecatalyst-report-date-issue/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Omniture Maintenance Release, Sep 17</title>
		<link>http://feeds.buglist.net/~r/Buglistnet/~3/8sdk9dnCG2g/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/09/omniture-maintenance-release-sep-17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SiteCatalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another maintenance release from Omniture, and this time the release notes includes a list of fixes made to SiteCatalyst, thank you Omniture !
Well at least most of the fixes, as far as I can see the changes/fixes made to the admin area of SiteCatalyst they don&#8217;t really get mentioned in the release notes.
I&#8217;ve especially noticed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another maintenance release from Omniture, and this time the release notes includes a list of fixes made to SiteCatalyst, <strong>thank you Omniture !</strong><br />
Well at least most of the fixes, as far as I can see the changes/fixes made to the admin area of SiteCatalyst they don&#8217;t really get mentioned in the release notes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve especially noticed a minor change made to the conversion classification editor.<br />
Prior to the 9/17 maintenance release, deleting a child numeric classification was impossible, You got no reaction from the editor when trying. This behaviour has changed a bit, trying to delete a child numeric classification now results in the parent being deleted instead, and when you recreate the lost parent classification the child magically re-emerges as well.<br />
I&#8217;m still trying to figure out the purpose of this change.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong><br />
Here is a video demonstrating the strange conversion classification editor behaviour.<br />
<p><a href="http://buglist.net/2009/09/omniture-maintenance-release-sep-17/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pjNRnwiIT8Wvu7c1NYfv6hURgtY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pjNRnwiIT8Wvu7c1NYfv6hURgtY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pjNRnwiIT8Wvu7c1NYfv6hURgtY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pjNRnwiIT8Wvu7c1NYfv6hURgtY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Buglistnet/~4/8sdk9dnCG2g" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/09/omniture-maintenance-release-sep-17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://buglist.net/2009/09/omniture-maintenance-release-sep-17/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Numeric Classification peculiarities</title>
		<link>http://feeds.buglist.net/~r/Buglistnet/~3/-i0ZhP7nM4w/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/09/numeric-classification-peculiarities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SiteCatalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peculiarities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sorting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although Numeric Classifications are having a few issues I still think it&#8217;s a great feature in Sitecatalyst.
However, now that our Numeric Classifications just suddenly for no apparent reason started working, I&#8217;ve noticed  a few peculiar things about the way they work on our report suites.
Sorting
Numeric Classifications creates new metrics you can use in your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although<a href="http://buglist.net/2009/08/numeric-classifications-in-sitecatalyst/"> Numeric Classifications are having a few issues</a> I still think it&#8217;s a great feature in Sitecatalyst.<br />
However, now that our Numeric Classifications just suddenly for no apparent reason started working, I&#8217;ve noticed  a few peculiar things about the way they work on our report suites.</p>
<p><strong>Sorting</strong><br />
Numeric Classifications creates new metrics you can use in your reports.<br />
I would expect any new metric, numeric, or otherwise calculated, to behave just like any build-in metric in regard to sorting.<br />
Metrics normally sort in descending order in SiteCatalyst, Numeric Classifications not being the exception, but they are not sorted on the actual value of the metric, the sorting is performed using the user provided values used to multiply by the existing metrics (Click-Throughs, Units, Orders etc).<br />
Bottom line: Numeric Classification metrics don&#8217;t sort.</p>
<p><strong>Totals</strong><br />
Sometimes the totals on our Numeric Classifications are working, sometimes they are not (total=0).  It&#8217;s possible there is a pattern, but I haven&#8217;t been able to figure out what that would be.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sn2KVnsC5pOQzVvwt5-wVF7xv9E/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sn2KVnsC5pOQzVvwt5-wVF7xv9E/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sn2KVnsC5pOQzVvwt5-wVF7xv9E/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sn2KVnsC5pOQzVvwt5-wVF7xv9E/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Buglistnet/~4/-i0ZhP7nM4w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/09/numeric-classification-peculiarities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://buglist.net/2009/09/numeric-classification-peculiarities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Omniture Release Notes policy</title>
		<link>http://feeds.buglist.net/~r/Buglistnet/~3/8cIjDMd2RMk/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/09/omniture-release-notes-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SiteCatalyst]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, I learned something new today.
If a SiteCatalyst maintenance release doesn&#8217;t contain any new features the release notes are left out completely, despite the fact that a lot of issues have been fixed in the maintenance release.
There is no official word from Omniture on why they do things this way.
So why is this such a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/see-hear-speak.png" alt="See Hear Speak no evil" title="See Hear Speak no evil" width="250" height="150" class="size-full wp-image-892 alignleft" />So, I learned something new today.<br />
If a SiteCatalyst maintenance release doesn&#8217;t contain any new features the release notes are left out completely, despite the fact that a lot of issues have been fixed in the maintenance release.<br />
There is no official word from Omniture on why they do things this way.<br />
So why is this such a big deal to me ?<br />
Well, creating a list of fixed issues would (I guess) be a pretty trivial task for Omniture to do, I do think Omniture is using Bugzilla internally, creating a list of closed/fixed issues between 2 dates in Bugzilla is done within minutes, granted, a skilled engineer would have to do some work on the output, but still, a few hours worth of work at Omniture could result in a nice and very thorough release note.<br />
A thorough release note could save me hours of work walking through tests etc, every time there is a maintenance release from Omniture, and unless I&#8217;m the only one with a long list of unresolved issues I guess a lot of other customers could benefit from such a release note as well.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: I should note however that Omniture Clientcare does the best they can to update the customers on any fixes and progress as soon as the information becomes available to Clientcare.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4k3vSx6BvK8stk8X4i_RMd2F1zQ/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4k3vSx6BvK8stk8X4i_RMd2F1zQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4k3vSx6BvK8stk8X4i_RMd2F1zQ/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4k3vSx6BvK8stk8X4i_RMd2F1zQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Buglistnet/~4/8cIjDMd2RMk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/09/omniture-release-notes-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://buglist.net/2009/09/omniture-release-notes-policy/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Omniture Maintenance Release,  Aug 27</title>
		<link>http://feeds.buglist.net/~r/Buglistnet/~3/AAUz3xIrCY8/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/08/omniture-maintenance-release-aug-27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SiteCatalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clickmap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The release note for the Aug 27 maintenance release is a bit different from usual, there is no word on any fixes made to SiteCatalyst.  It&#8217;s not that they didn&#8217;t fix anything in SiteCatalyst, on the contrary actually they fixed at least a few very long lasting issues.
This is what I&#8217;ve found so far:
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The release note for the Aug 27 maintenance release is a bit different from usual, there is no word on any fixes made to SiteCatalyst.  It&#8217;s not that they didn&#8217;t fix anything in SiteCatalyst, on the contrary actually they fixed at least a few very long lasting issues.<br />
This is what I&#8217;ve found so far:</p>
<p><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/sitecatalyst-target-editor-character-encoding-problem.png" alt="Sitecatalyst target ditor character encoding problem" title="Sitecatalyst target ditor character encoding problem" width="233" height="271" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-858" />The &#8220;Targets editor&#8221; has been fixed. This is really great news, the targets editor has been broken for almost a year. You&#8217;ve always been able to create new targets, but editing existing ones wasn&#8217;t working, in the beginning all conversion related metrics were missing from the dropdowns  when trying to edit a target, but then as part of  the SiteCatalyst 14.6 release, the editor became completely broken, all metrics were missing when trying to edit a target and a few javascript errors were also included.<br />
This has all been fixed now. Perfect ?<br />
Close, but not 100%, as usual, engineering didn&#8217;t bother testing on any foreign character sets, so at least Danish characters aren&#8217;t supported in the dropdowns.</p>
<p>For those unfamiliar with Danish:<br />
<strong>bredbÃ¥nd</strong> is supposed to be <strong>bredbånd</strong><br />
<strong>sÃ¸geord</strong> is supposed to be <strong>søgeord</strong></p>
<p>Clickmaps: Finally Omniture is moving towards supporting the <a href="http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_button.asp" rel="nofollow">BUTTON tag</a> in Clickmaps, if you add a s_objectID in the onclick handler of your button tags, you can now be pretty sure those buttons will show up when turning on the Clickmap plug-in.<br />
I think it&#8217;s great news that Omniture has started fixing some of the Clickmap issues, but there is still a long way to go before things are working as specified in the Clickmap user manual.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong><br />
I just noticed yet another thing that slipped through the release testing at Omniture.<br />
In the Targets Manager, all target names now have the textstring <strong>Name</strong> prepended.<br />
If You create a target with the name Sales, it will show up in the Targets Manager as : Name Sales.<br />
I know it&#8217;s no big deal, it just looks sloppy, but I guess we&#8217;ll get used to those new names.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wkqIKyY1eBuY9r6_iX_GdCH3M3k/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wkqIKyY1eBuY9r6_iX_GdCH3M3k/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wkqIKyY1eBuY9r6_iX_GdCH3M3k/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wkqIKyY1eBuY9r6_iX_GdCH3M3k/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Buglistnet/~4/AAUz3xIrCY8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/08/omniture-maintenance-release-aug-27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://buglist.net/2009/08/omniture-maintenance-release-aug-27/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>SiteCatalyst default menu structure</title>
		<link>http://feeds.buglist.net/~r/Buglistnet/~3/MopfiYbpL-c/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/08/sitecatalyst-default-menu-structure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SiteCatalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[menu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The option to customize the menu structure is a feature in SiteCatalyst I really appreciate.
It&#8217;s literally possible to turn everything upside down if that&#8217;s what you want.
In our company we have rearranged quite a few things and made some very often used custom reports available in the menu with the right set of metrics selected [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/default_menu_structure.png" alt="SiteCatalyst default menu structure" title="SiteCatalyst default menu structure" width="288" height="156" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-826" />The option to customize the menu structure is a feature in SiteCatalyst I really appreciate.<br />
It&#8217;s literally possible to turn everything upside down if that&#8217;s what you want.<br />
In our company we have rearranged quite a few things and made some very often used custom reports available in the menu with the right set of metrics selected and some filters applied. In addition we have hidden a few unused menus.</p>
<p>Then one day I realized that I had hidden a menu that I on rare occasions actually need. This is where the &#8220;Show Omniture&#8217;s default menu structure&#8221; is supposed to come in handy, you&#8217;ll find it in the &#8220;My Account -> Report Settings&#8221; area.<br />
Unfortunately it isn&#8217;t working, checking this option changes absolutely nothing <img src='http://buglist.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/bCCtB4god6_itVC7_nAXOINNzmk/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/bCCtB4god6_itVC7_nAXOINNzmk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/bCCtB4god6_itVC7_nAXOINNzmk/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/bCCtB4god6_itVC7_nAXOINNzmk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Buglistnet/~4/MopfiYbpL-c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/08/sitecatalyst-default-menu-structure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://buglist.net/2009/08/sitecatalyst-default-menu-structure/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
